An architectural pattern is a reusable solution to a common problem in software architecture. Understanding these patterns is essential for an architect, as they provide a common language and a proven framework for building robust, scalable, and maintainable systems.
Contents
hide
In this article, we will describe 8 common architectural patterns, from traditional to modern. For each pattern, we will explain its core concept and provide a practical use case to help you understand when to apply it.
1. Monolithic Architecture
- Concept: This is the traditional architectural pattern where the entire application is built as a single, unified codebase and deployed as a single unit. All components, from the user interface to the business logic and data layer, reside in one application.
- Use Case: Ideal for small applications, new startups with limited resources, or Proof of Concept (PoC) projects. It is simple to develop and deploy initially.
2. Layered Architecture
- Concept: Also known as N-Tier architecture, this pattern organizes the application into distinct, horizontal layers. Each layer has a specific responsibility and can only communicate with the layer directly below it. Common layers include the Presentation Layer, Business Logic Layer, and Data Access Layer.
- Use Case: Perfectly suited for traditional enterprise applications where a clear separation of concerns, roles, and security levels is required.
3. Client-Server Architecture
- Concept: This is a fundamental distributed pattern where a server provides resources or services to one or more clients. The server listens for requests, processes them, and returns results to the clients.
- Use Case: Widely used in web applications, email services, and online games, where clients (web browsers, mobile apps) request data or services from a central server.
4. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
- Concept: This architectural pattern builds an application from a collection of loosely coupled, fine-grained services. These services are typically larger than microservices and communicate with each other through a central enterprise service bus (ESB) or standard protocols.
- Use Case: Common in large enterprise systems that need to integrate legacy systems and allow for services to be reused across multiple applications.
5. Microservices Architecture
- Concept: A modern architectural pattern that breaks an application into a suite of very small, independent services. Each microservice can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, often with its own database.
- Use Case: Ideal for large, complex applications like e-commerce platforms or streaming services that require flexible scaling, technological independence, and high fault tolerance.
6. Event-Driven Architecture
- Concept: This pattern builds a system based on events. Components communicate by generating and consuming “events” rather than making direct calls. For example, in an online order processing system, when a “successful order” event is published, other services (payment, inventory) can react to it accordingly.
- Use Case: Suitable for systems that require high scalability, real-time data processing, and applications like IoT (Internet of Things).
7. Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS)
- Concept: CQRS is a pattern that separates the data read (Query) and write (Command) operations. Instead of using a single data model, CQRS uses two separate models: one for updating data and one for reading data. This helps optimize performance and scalability.
- Use Case: Best for applications with complex data queries and high-performance requirements, or systems where read and write operations have vastly different demands.
8. Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters)
- Concept: This pattern focuses on isolating the application’s core business logic from external technologies (such as databases, UI, third-party services). The core logic communicates through “ports,” and “adapters” translate the protocol to communicate with the outside world.
- Use Case: Extremely useful for building applications that need to easily swap out external technologies (e.g., switching from MySQL to PostgreSQL) without affecting the core business logic.
Conclusion: The Right Tool for the Right Job
Choosing the right architectural pattern is one of the most critical decisions for an architect. There is no single “best” pattern. Instead, each pattern has its own strengths and weaknesses, making it suitable for different requirements and contexts.
A solid understanding of these architectural patterns provides you with a robust foundation for designing effective and efficient systems.
